Document Type

Dissertation

Date of Award

2025

Degree Name

Doctor of Education (Ded)

Department

Education

First Advisor

Erin Lehmann

Abstract

This study examines grading in higher education from two distinct perspectives: graduate students’ perceptions of a grading scheme that utilizes rubrics and self-assessment and instructors’ perceptions of academic freedom in grading. The first study examined graduate students’ perspectives on a grading scheme utilizing rubrics and self-assessment. Data from focus groups and journals revealed four main themes: the importance of clear expectations, enhanced synergy between rubrics and self-assessment when transparency increased, bias towards rubrics based on more exposure, and mixed feelings surrounding perceptions of self-assessment and its influence on learning. The second study investigated non-tenured faculty’s perceptions of academic freedom in grading, collecting data through interviews, syllabi, and journal entries. While instructors initially felt autonomy over their grading, many infringements on that autonomy were revealed as conversations continued, shedding light on pressures that subtly impacted their grading. These pressures often led to grade inflation, sometimes benefiting learning, but not always. Untenured faculty need to reflect on how outside pressures affect their grading to truly understand the extent of their autonomy versus participation in the academic capitalism machine. Both studies revealed how institutional processes and prior experiences can shape students’ and faculty’s perspectives, especially when it comes to assessment and grading practices.

Subject Categories

Educational Leadership

Keywords

Capitalism grade inflation grading higher education rubric self-assessment

Number of Pages

74

Publisher

University of South Dakota

Available for download on Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Share

COinS