Date of Award

Spring 2022

Document Type

Honors Thesis

Department/Major

English

First Advisor

John Howe

Second Advisor

Prentiss Clark

Third Advisor

Timothy Schorn

Keywords

higher education, South Dakota, political rhetoric, critical race theory, opportunity center, fairness in women's sports, 2021, document analysis

Subject Categories

American Politics | Education Policy

Abstract

This study is a document analysis in an attempt to understand political rhetoric from four main players from the end of the 2021 South Dakota Legislative Session to the end of the 2022 Legislative Session. These four players are 1) Governor Noem, 2) the Board of Regents, 3) the South Dakota Legislature, and 4) the Argus Leader. One-hundred eight documents from these sources were analyzed, and deemed “rhetorically political” by presence of the phrases “fairness in women’s sports,” “critical race theory,” or “opportunity center,” or deemed “rhetorically apolitical” by the absence of these phrases. The rates of rhetorically political documents, by source, are then compared, and questions are asked about what it all means for South Dakota higher education moving forward.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.