Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2021
Disciplines
Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law | Law
Abstract
This Article examines the United States Supreme Court's July 9, 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma, which held that the historic boundaries of the Creek reservation remain intact, and argues that the decision may signal a sea change in the course of federal Indian law of the magnitude of Obergefell v. Hodges in the LGBT rights arena. The Article shows how the opinion lays a very strong foundation for a much-needed return to traditional federal Indian law principles, respectful treatment of tribal governments as a third sovereign in the American system, and an understanding of fairness from the perspective of tribes and Native individuals. The possible effects of Justice Barrett's replacement of Justice Ginsburg on the Court's future federal Indian law jurisprudence are also explored. The Article concludes with the hope that Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion will foster predictability in the wildly unstable area of diminishment and disestablishment jurisprudence, as well as in other facets of federal Indian law.
Publication Title
37 Georgia State University Law Review 739
Recommended Citation
Ann E. Tweedy, Has Federal Indian Law Finally Arrived at "The Far End of the Trail of Tears"?, 37 Ga. St. L. Rev. 739 (2021).